Built for CEOs, CTOs, CFOs and CHROs

Engineering Analytics for the AI Era

GitMe analyzes code changes to estimate engineering effort and AI contribution — showing where work creates lasting value for smarter leadership decisions.

Explore the product tour
Analyzed by GitMe

How GitMe works

From code to
clearer decisions.

Connect your Git host. Let GitMe evaluate the work. Bring Real Effort Value (R.E.V.) into your next leadership conversation.

01Connect

Your code. Your workflow.

Start with the code changes in your existing repositories.

GitHub logo GitLab logo Bitbucket logo
Example code change

Improve jwt refresh fallback (#1201)

+ add session token rotation

+ guard stale session reads

02Evaluate

Insight without storage.

Encrypted, read-only access. Temporary analysis, with no source file retention.

Read-only accessYour repositories stay in your control.

Zero file retentionSource files are not stored.

03Understand

Make the work visible.

See estimated effort, AI contribution, and the type of work delivered.

R.E.V. score
24

Example evaluation

Feature Addition AI leverage 3.03x

Committer: Alex

The bigger picture

Developer performance · Illustrative demo

Executive Control Tower

REV Performance Lens

See true effort, not vanity activity. Compare squads on meaningful contribution quality.

12 Work Categories

Expose where effort is spent across features, fixes, refactors, operations, and more.

AI Optimization

Separate AI-assisted output from human contribution to improve quality and accountability.

Org-Aware Workforce Design

Model in-house vs. outsourced teams, expertise tiers, and talent pools for dynamic staffing decisions.

Cost, Flow, ROI impact

Cost

Up to 60%

Progressive reduction in development costs by optimizing head count.

Lean org structure · lower burn

Flow

Up to 30%

Productivity increase through early bottleneck detection and intervention.

Faster releases · less idle time

ROI

Up to 70%

Reduce sunk cost by focusing investment on the most valuable work streams.

Capital efficiency · higher impact

Inside GitMe · Interactive product tour

Your engineering questions.
Answered.

See how GitMe turns code changes into clearer investment, AI, and team decisions.

Executive SummaryACME · Demo workspace
GitMe Executive Summary showing baseline engineering effort, AI leverage, and contribution concentration in the ACME demo workspace

What is our engineering investment delivering?

See the baseline effort behind delivered work, how concentrated that effort is across the team, and its estimated cost equivalent. Understand output and ownership before making investment decisions.

How much effort is AI saving us?

Compare estimated effort saved through AI with the human effort still required. Track the trend over time to understand where AI is providing leverage.

Where is our engineering effort going?

See how effort is distributed across features, maintenance, tests, security, and performance. Filter by project, repository, developer, or tags to investigate the investment mix.

Who is contributing—and how?

Bring contribution trends, AI leverage, work mix, and durability together in one developer report. Compare with a relevant peer group to understand the work in context.

Does the work we ship last?

Follow how much past engineering effort remains effective as each cohort ages. Drill into a repository to see where durability deserves a closer look.

What needs leadership attention?

Turn engineering signals into a clear view of strengths and watchouts. Read the observed pattern and the recommended action before deciding what to investigate.

What changed—and why does it matter?

Read shipped work in plain language, then inspect the underlying change. Connect a business-facing update to its developer, repository, effort, and technical summary.

Can I ask my own questions?

Ask Gitzy a question about your engineering data in plain language. Get a real chart, a written explanation, and a direct path to the relevant workspace.

Your team. Your code. Your answers.See what your engineering data can tell you.

Get Started ↗Talk to Sales

Real product screens from a demo workspace. REV and AI leverage are estimates; dollar values represent effort equivalents, not revenue or profit.

Why you need GitMe

GitMe
  • • Optimize headcount without guesswork
  • • Identify real contributors instantly
  • • Separate real effort from noise
  • • Expose hidden productivity gaps
  • • Measure AI’s true impact on delivery
  • • Make defensible hiring and downsizing decisions

Evidence-based contribution measurement

The metric that best captures real contribution: R.E.V.

GitMe's R.E.V. measurement has a 0.93 correlation with real contribution. Traditional metrics show much weaker relationships: Story Points around 0.4, Lines of Code around 0.2, and Commit Count around 0.1. That is why GitMe reveals real impact, not vanity activity.

R.E.V. ↔ Real Contribution GitMe

0.93

Story Points ↔ Real Contribution

~0.4

Lines of Code ↔ Real Contribution

~0.2

Commit Count ↔ Real Contribution

~0.1

Bottleneck Visibility

Surface review, refactor, and rework bottlenecks before they become delivery risk.

Effort Survival Rate

Evaluate which outputs survive over 12 months to measure engineering quality in context.

Organization Intelligence

Quantify contribution by team model, role, and specialization to optimize capacity planning.

ROI by Design

Translate daily development activity into board-ready efficiency, sustainability, and ROI indicators.

How it works

A measurable system, not another dashboard

  1. 1. Connect delivery data. GitMe reads engineering activity and maps work into 12 job categories.
  2. 2. Compute REV. Real Effort Value quantifies meaningful developer contribution with context.
  3. 3. Separate AI and human effort. Understand where AI accelerates value and where expertise is still critical.
  4. 4. Track survival and ROI. Use 12-month Effort Survival Rate and executive scorecards to optimize cost, quality, and talent strategy.

Designed for strategic decisions

From engineering noise to leadership clarity

  • • Prioritize hiring based on real contribution patterns, not assumptions.
  • • Rebalance in-house and outsourced capacity with measurable confidence.
  • • Coach teams using category-level effort data and quality retention trends.
  • • Build sustainable AI adoption with transparent performance signals.
  • • Present board-level progress with defensible, measurable outcomes.
Explore insights from GitMe blog →

Executive Outcome

Build a high-performance engineering organization with measurable trust

GitMe helps leadership teams optimize head count, reveal bottlenecks, govern AI contribution quality, and align engineering operations with financial outcomes.